Hi Benjamin,
> Dual sensors devices reports pen and touch on two different reports.
> Using the quirk HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT allows us to create a new input
> device to forward pen events.
>
> The quirk HID_QUIRK_NO_EMPTY_INPUT avoids the creation of input devices
> for the not used mouse emulation present on Win7 certified devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I like the approach, it is indeed quite simple. Some comment below, though.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> index 315500c..77ba751 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct mt_device {
> unsigned last_field_index; /* last field index of the report */
> unsigned last_slot_field; /* the last field of a slot */
> unsigned mt_report_id; /* the report ID of the multitouch device */
> + unsigned pen_report_id; /* the report ID of the pen device */
> __s8 inputmode; /* InputMode HID feature, -1 if non-existent */
> __s8 inputmode_index; /* InputMode HID feature index in the report */
> __s8 maxcontact_report_id; /* Maximum Contact Number HID feature,
> @@ -365,6 +366,35 @@ static void mt_store_field(struct hid_usage *usage, struct mt_device *td,
> f->usages[f->length++] = usage->hid;
> }
>
> +static int mt_pen_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> + struct hid_field *field, struct hid_usage *usage,
> + unsigned long **bit, int *max)
> +{
> + struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +
> + td->pen_report_id = field->report->id;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mt_pen_input_mapped(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> + struct hid_field *field, struct hid_usage *usage,
> + unsigned long **bit, int *max)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mt_pen_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
> + struct hid_usage *usage, __s32 value)
> +{
> + /* let hid-input handle it */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mt_pen_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
> +{
> +}
Should the next patch not go in here directly?
> +
> static int mt_touch_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> struct hid_field *field, struct hid_usage *usage,
> unsigned long **bit, int *max)
> @@ -725,14 +755,12 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> * We need to ignore fields that belong to other collections
> * such as Mouse that might have the same GenericDesktop usages. */
> if (field->application != HID_DG_TOUCHSCREEN &&
> + field->application != HID_DG_PEN &&
> field->application != HID_DG_TOUCHPAD)
> return -1;
>
> - /* eGalax devices provide a Digitizer.Stylus input which overrides
> - * the correct Digitizers.Finger X/Y ranges.
> - * Let's just ignore this input. */
> if (field->physical == HID_DG_STYLUS)
> - return -1;
> + return mt_pen_input_mapping(hdev, hi, field, usage, bit, max);
>
> return mt_touch_input_mapping(hdev, hi, field, usage, bit, max);
> }
> @@ -741,6 +769,9 @@ static int mt_input_mapped(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> struct hid_field *field, struct hid_usage *usage,
> unsigned long **bit, int *max)
> {
> + if (field->physical == HID_DG_STYLUS)
> + return mt_pen_input_mapped(hdev, hi, field, usage, bit, max);
> +
> return mt_touch_input_mapped(hdev, hi, field, usage, bit, max);
> }
>
> @@ -752,6 +783,9 @@ static int mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
> if (field->report->id == td->mt_report_id)
> return mt_touch_event(hid, field, usage, value);
>
> + if (field->report->id == td->pen_report_id)
> + return mt_pen_event(hid, field, usage, value);
> +
> /* ignore other reports */
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -765,6 +799,9 @@ static void mt_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report)
>
> if (report->id == td->mt_report_id)
> mt_touch_report(hid, report);
> +
> + if (report->id == td->pen_report_id)
> + mt_pen_report(hid, report);
> }
>
> static void mt_set_input_mode(struct hid_device *hdev)
> @@ -887,6 +924,14 @@ static int mt_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> */
> hdev->quirks |= HID_QUIRK_NO_INPUT_SYNC;
>
> + /*
> + * This allows the driver to handle different input sensors
> + * that emits events through different reports on the same HID
> + * device.
> + */
> + hdev->quirks |= HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT;
> + hdev->quirks |= HID_QUIRK_NO_EMPTY_INPUT;
I seem to recall problem with MULTI_INPUT on some devices. Should
these not be turned on based on the device type?
> +
> td = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mt_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!td) {
> dev_err(&hdev->dev, "cannot allocate multitouch data\n");
> @@ -896,6 +941,8 @@ static int mt_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> td->inputmode = -1;
> td->maxcontact_report_id = -1;
> td->cc_index = -1;
> + td->mt_report_id = -1;
> + td->pen_report_id = -1;
> hid_set_drvdata(hdev, td);
>
> td->fields = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mt_fields), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
