We can't trust dj_report->device_index because it comes from the
user and hasn't been range checked. It is used as an offset into
the djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[] array which has 7 elements.
There is one range check already in logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_device()
and I have copy and pasted that here.
DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN is 1.
DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX is 6.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This is a static checker fix and I'm not certain it's correct,
please look it over carefully.
I do not know this code well, so I don't know why a zero index is
invalid.
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
index 9500f2f..c01cd25 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
@@ -701,6 +701,13 @@ static int logi_dj_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
* anything else with it.
*/
+ if ((dj_report->device_index < DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN) ||
+ (dj_report->device_index > DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX)) {
+ dev_err(&hdev->dev, "%s: invalid device index:%d\n", __func__,
+ dj_report->device_index);
+ return true;
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&djrcv_dev->lock, flags);
if (dj_report->report_id == REPORT_ID_DJ_SHORT) {
switch (dj_report->report_type) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
