From: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> When PM_RUNTIME is not defined, pm_runtime_get_sync() returns 1, see include/linux/pm_runtime.c::__pm_runtime_resume(), and the check of the return value was overlooking this, in this case bma150_open() would return 1 which is not expected by upper layers. Maybe the check for != -ENOSYS (Function not implemented) was meant to cover this, but pm_runtime_get_sync() does not return this value. For now fix the issue locally by checking explicitly for negative return values. Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/input/misc/bma150.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c b/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c index 08ffcab..e5d1894 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int bma150_open(struct bma150_data *bma150) int error; error = pm_runtime_get_sync(&bma150->client->dev); - if (error && error != -ENOSYS) + if (error < 0 && error != -ENOSYS) return error; /* -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
