On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:24:11PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > > It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also > > involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with > > a perfectly good name instead. I wouldn't even know what name to choose > > for the new API. > > > > How about devm_ioremap_resource()? Sounds equally fitting, and is shorter. 2 cents, I wrote back then: * the new function is not named 'devm_ioremap_resource' because it does more than just ioremap, namely request_mem_region. I didn't want to create implicit knowledge here. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
