Re: Why Cypress does not upstream its trackpad driver?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/07/2012 03:30 PM, David Solda wrote:
Kamal,

My name is Dave Solda and I would be happy to answer any other questions that you have. Troy's response is correct however as in order to support the default Linux mouse class, our firmware would also have to be modified to do so, which cannot be done in system. Our packet protocol maxes out at an 8 byte packet, which requires a change to the Linux standard in this case.

Our goal in working with canonical was to provide something on Linux that would support multi-touch and not only have default single finger movement supported.

If I am mistaken and he Linux kernel would accept this, then we can proceed to upstream, however all indications we have is that this patch would be rejected.  If you (or others on from the locus alias) have any inputs, I would be happy to receive them.


Really you should ask yourselves:

1) What benefit do you enjoy by keeping the code out of the upstream kernel?

2) What are the benefits of having a driver for your hardware in the upstream kernel?

If 2 > 1, then the course of action seems obvious.

Doing nothing because of some perceived impediment doesn't help anybody.

David Daney

Dave



On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:13 AM, "Troy Abercrombia" <ta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Kamal

Unfortunately, We're not able to upstream the driver as it would be denied because it changes the Linux mouse structure framework.

Thanks
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: Kamal Mostafa [mailto:kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:32 AM
To: Ozan Çağlayan
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx; customercare; mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why Cypress does not upstream its trackpad driver?

On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 17:47 -0500, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
Hi,

This driver [0] was written with a cooperation of Cypress, Dell and
Canonical Engineers within the last 3-4 months. It is very nice that
Cypress as a vendor cooperated with Canonical (Because Canonical works
with Dell for their Project Sputnik and Dell XPS13 is used as the main
hardware for that project and Dell XPS13 has this type of trackpad,
Bingo!), and I am also glad that Ubuntu users benefits from this
driver.

The driver brings multi-touch scrolling, disable-while-tapping and
makes Fn+Fx touchpad disable/enable work for not only Dell XPS13 but
for all laptops having this trackpad (My Lenovo Ultrabook U300s for
example, I tested the patches on fedora 17's 3.6 kernel and it works
quiet nice)

But what I am not getting that why NOBODY from Cypress/Canonical/Dell
isn't bothering to push this driver to upstream?


In fact, Canonical is working on preparing the Cypress PS/2 trackpad driver for submitting upstream.


Is it too hard? I don't think so as the patches are quite non-invasive
and small.


Your estimate of the work/risk involved not withstanding, I chose to deploy this experimental driver in stages -- first in the oem-specific "Sputnik project" kernel, then (recently) in the main Ubuntu kernel, then finally (soon) upstream -- so as to minimize regressions while shaking out the bugs.  For example, the version to which you linked does include a regression (breaks some ALPS touchpads) which we discovered only after deploying in Ubuntu.

I expect to submit the Cypress driver upstream within two weeks.  Of course, my work on the driver is (and has been) publicly available[1].

-Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[1] The latest version of this driver is represented by the patch set:
    http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu%2Fubuntu-quantal.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=Cypress+PS%2F2



Is the only distribution around is Ubuntu?
Is the only laptop sold in the world is Dell XPS13 with an Ubuntu?

I'm not trying to be impolite but it hurts me to see that a vendor
produces an open-source driver for its device but makes use of it only
through a specific distribution.

If Cypress is just beginning developing open-source drivers for their
devices, I hope that after this mail they will be much sensitive about
the issue and push their drivers even before the release of their
devices to make user experience flawless.

(I googled and searched the archives of LKML and linux-input but
couldn't find a discussion or patch series about the driver. If I
missed it, ignore the whole stuff above)

[0]: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/178903/


This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message.
N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���0��h��i


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux