Hi Benjamin,
> Currently, there is no way to know the index of the current field
> in the .input_mapping and .event callbacks when this field is inside
> an array of HID fields.
> This patch forwards this index to the input_mapping and event
> callbacks.
I agree with the idea, but the function argument list is becoming
ridiculously long... Could we remove the usage pointer argument, at
least?
int (*event)(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_field *field,
unsigned int usage_index, __s32 value);
> @@ -1071,19 +1072,24 @@ static void hid_input_field(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
> for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>
> if (HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE & field->flags) {
> - hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n], value[n], interrupt);
> + hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n], n,
> + value[n], interrupt);
> continue;
> }
>
> if (field->value[n] >= min && field->value[n] <= max
> && field->usage[field->value[n] - min].hid
> && search(value, field->value[n], count))
> - hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[field->value[n] - min], 0, interrupt);
> + hid_process_event(hid, field,
> + &field->usage[field->value[n] - min], n,
> + 0, interrupt);
Wrong index?
>
> if (value[n] >= min && value[n] <= max
> && field->usage[value[n] - min].hid
> && search(field->value, value[n], count))
> - hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[value[n] - min], 1, interrupt);
> + hid_process_event(hid, field,
> + &field->usage[value[n] - min], n,
> + 1, interrupt);
Wrong index?
> }
>
> memcpy(field->value, value, count * sizeof(__s32));
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
