On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: (...) >> Is biasing what you need to do? (...) >> All I really want is that platforms have a clear idea about >> how and where the pins will be handled, and that if GPIO >> and pinctrl handle the same lines, they need to interact. >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij > > Friendly poke. I don't know how to respond to that? I asked a question about what the intent of the patch was and the generic thinking behind this approach and it remains unanswered. I think I have seen other patches doing the proper thing for pinctrl-single by implementing the proper pinctrl_request_gpio() pinctrl_free_gpio() pinctrl_gpio_direction_input() pinctrl_gpio_direction_output() in that very GPIO driver. So I suspect that this patch should be dropped, unless you have some other compelling usecase to bring to the show? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
