On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:39:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:24:30AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > In certain cases (for example when a cdev structure is embedded into > > another object whose lifetime is controlled by a separate device object) > > it is beneficial to tie lifetime of another struct device to the lifetime > > of character device so that related object is not freed until after > > char_dev object is freed. To achieve this allow setting a "parent" device > > for character devices and pin them when doing cdev_add() and unpin when > > last reference to cdev structure is being released. > > Why struct device and not simply struct kobject? It was more convenient for my uses and I also think that parents of character devices will be struct devices... I however will not insist and if you prefer using more generic kobject I can change it, Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
