Tested this and works. -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:59 AM To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Pandruvada, Srinivas; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We're holding a spinlock here so we can't call kmalloc() with > GFP_KERNEL. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> Jonathan, could you please take this one as well, as it depends on the series in your tree? Thanks. > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 4ac759c..0c93b10 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ int sensor_hub_register_callback(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, > spin_unlock(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock); > return -EINVAL; > } > - callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_KERNEL); > + callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!callback) { > spin_unlock(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock); > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev, > if (pdata->pending.status && pdata->pending.attr_usage_id == > report->field[i]->usage->hid) { > hid_dbg(hdev, "data was pending ...\n"); > - pdata->pending.raw_data = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + pdata->pending.raw_data = kmalloc(sz, GFP_ATOMIC); > if (pdata->pending.raw_data) { > memcpy(pdata->pending.raw_data, ptr, sz); > pdata->pending.raw_size = sz; > -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
