Re: [PATCH 02/19] Input: Improve the events-per-packet estimate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ping,
>
> Long time no see. :-)
>
>> > +       /* Make room for KEY and MSC events */
>> > +       events += 7;
>>
>> It is nice to get rid of the redundant pieces and to incorporate
>> common functions. Thank you.
>>
>> I have a question about the code above though.  Why do we use 7
>> instead of going through the keys like:
>>
>>       for (i = 0; i < KEY_MAX; i++)
>>               if (test_bit(i, dev->keybit))
>>                       events++;
>
> Keyboards register a large amount of different keys, but seldom send
> more than one or two at a time. The value 7 is ad hoc, admittedly, but
> it makes the default buffer 8 bytes, which happens to precisely match
> the default buffer in evdev.

That can be a valid reason until we need to report more keys
simultaneously. Please update the comments so we know why we end up
with 7.

Thank you.

Ping
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux