On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> to receive updates for the input subsystem. You will get:
I get an annoying conflict, and the reason I call it annoying is not
because it's hard to resolve, it's because doing that shows that you
seem to have preferred using
dev_dbg(&input->dev.parent, ...)
over the much more natural
dev_dbg(&input->dev, ...)
which would seem to make more sense.
Why? Are the input layer device names so bad that using them for debug
output is useless? And if so, why *are* they so bad?
I'm going to take your version over Greg's more straightforward one,
because I assume Greg did things a bit more mindlessly and I think you
presumably had a *reason* for your extra (stupid) ".parent" part. But
I'm unhappy with it, because I suspect the reason you did that implies
that the input layer does something bad.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
