On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:28:35PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > (doh, trying again without attachment) > > Hi, > > to aid in the discussion, I have shared a drawing of the MT model > and the (supposed) win8 model. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KKu7kqPOsvE9tCmWhdGnmO8tgmN0Cd-Mv_crVaCZueY/view having an asciiart version of this in Documentation/ would be quite useful, IMO > > > @@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ The TOUCH and WIDTH parameters have a geometrical interpretation; imagine > > > looking through a window at someone gently holding a finger against the > > > glass. You will see two regions, one inner region consisting of the part > > > of the finger actually touching the glass, and one outer region formed by > > > -the perimeter of the finger. The diameter of the inner region is the > > > +the perimeter of the finger. The center of the inner region is > > > +ABS_MT_POSITION_X/Y. The center of the outer region may be different, > > > +denoted by ABS_MT_APPROACH_X/Y. The diameter of the inner region is the > > > ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, the diameter of the outer region is > > > ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR. Now imagine the person pressing the finger harder > > > against the glass. The inner region will increase, and in general, the > > > @@ -252,6 +254,9 @@ can distinguish between the two axis, but not (uniquely) any values in > > > between. In such cases, the range of ABS_MT_ORIENTATION should be [0, 1] > > > [4]. > > > > > > +For devices capable of 360 degree orientation, the reported orientation > > > +should be twice the given range. > > > > Like Chase, I don't understand the necessity of that. > > The MT model supports the arbitrary orientation of an ellipse. The > angle is defined as a [-90,90] degree clockwise angle between the y > axis and the major axis of the ellipse (marked o in the figure). Only > 180 degrees are specified due to the symmetry; rotating 135 degrees is > equivalent to -45 degrees. > > In the win8 model, as in the windows surface model and most > implementations of FTIR, it is possible to distinguish the absolute > direction of a finger. This is equivalent to an ellipse with an arrow > (the angle is marked A in the figure). > > To accomodate the directional angle in the MT model, one can simply > report the full [-180,180] range instead. That is, report 135 degrees > instead of -45. Insert a paragraph into the actual documentation. I think that's more helpful than tacking it on (if not quite as nice in a diff) "The orientation of the ellipse. The value should describe a signed quarter of a revolution clockwise around the touch center. The signed value range is arbitrary, but zero should be returned for a finger aligned along the Y axis of the surface, a negative value when finger is turned to the left, and a positive value when finger turned to the right. When completely aligned with the X axis, the range max should be returned. Touch ellipsis are symmetrical by default. For devices capable of true 360 degree orientation, the reported orientation must exceed the range max to indicate more than a quarter of a revolution. For an upside-down finger, range max * 2 should be returned. Orientation can be omitted if the touching object is circular, or if the information is not available in the kernel driver. Partial orientation support is possible if the device can distinguish between the two axis, but not (uniquely) any values in between. In such cases, the range of ABS_MT_ORIENTATION should be [0, 1] [4]." Not a big fan of reporting values above absmin/absmax, tbh. It means we can't rely on the axis values and have to special-case it. Plus, there's no way to detect this before you actually get a value. > > > + > > > ABS_MT_POSITION_X > > > > > > The surface X coordinate of the center of the touching ellipse. > > > @@ -260,6 +265,23 @@ ABS_MT_POSITION_Y > > > > > > The surface Y coordinate of the center of the touching ellipse. > > > > > > +ABS_MT_APPROACH_X > > > > Honestly, I think that ABS_MT_APPROACH_* is really confusing for > > end-users (Xorg, Wayland, Qt, ...). I know that the explanation are > > given, but looking at the mess we had with the use of the MT events > > before it has been documented, I don't think this is the right term to > > use. Without the doc, and with a little bit of bad faith, I would say > > that approach refers to the T coordinate in Win8 doc (the approximate > > position where the user wants to touch), whereas the POSITION_* is > > more the center of the ellipse of the touch.... But it's the invert... > > ;-) > > Looking at the figure, it is clear that the MT model has two centers, > one for each ellipse. Thus, center is not discriminating > enough. Perhaps ABS_MT_OUTER_X/Y is more appropriate, then? ABS_MT_OUTER_CENTER Cheers, Peter > > > > +For win8 devices with Azimuth or Twist defined, the range max is the value > > > +for 90 degrees, and the orientation mapping is > > > + > > > + ABS_MT_ORIENTATION := twist < 2 * max ? twist : twist - 4 * max > > Reading the HID spec again, it seems azimuth is the preferred value > for touch, so twist can be omitted here. Also, it seems the angle > should be counter-clockwise, thus the sign is wrong. On the other > hand, it is unclear what the reference point is, maybe it can only be > used for differential updates. Also, the word "cursor" is not further > specified, it could be the orientation of the touch point or the > orientation of the whole area. This hopefully will become clearer with > time. > > Thanks, > Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
