On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:01:37AM -0700, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > > > It probably should, yes. One of the reasons supporting this is that during > > > USB reset (for example), the descriptors are reread from the device, which > > > has a potential to cause a mismatch if a full rebind cycle is not > > > performed. (I have a patch in my queue that tries to fix this, but moving > > > the fixups to ll drivers is still something I will be considering). > > > > Sounds good, it will also pave the way for the modalias patches. > > A proper and clean implementation will have to be thought about though. > > I specifically want to avoid situation when we'll be heading towards > "let's put all quirk handling into one driver under giant VID/PID-based > switch", as getting rid of that was the very original pulse to have HID > bus introduced. Absolutely. Less in-kernel lookups, less complex switches and more modularity. Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
