Hi Konstantin, This was the original implementation http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg15225.html Jiri suggested we removed the conditional compilation and we accepted. Which are your reasons to add those conditionals back again? Cheers, Nestor On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Before commit 534a7b8e1 "HID: Add full support for Logitech Unifying receivers" > Logitech Unifying receiver can work as generic device without special driver, > after that commit these devices does not works without special driver. > > After this patch they will use generic driver if special driver is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > index af08ce7..3d7a174 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > @@ -1462,8 +1462,10 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = { > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_DFGT_WHEEL) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_G25_WHEEL) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_G27_WHEEL) }, > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_LOGITECH_DJ) > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_UNIFYING_RECEIVER) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_UNIFYING_RECEIVER_2) }, > +#endif > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_WII_WHEEL) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_RUMBLEPAD2) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_SPACETRAVELLER) }, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
