On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:00:35PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > In my first tests, I was doing readouts in userspace using hidraw, > > which performed quite well. > > > > Bandwidth could be an issue, but I'd like to use the current APIs as > > much as possible so I don't need to go modifying mtdev, X, ... > > Unless you do clustering, filtering and what not in-kernel, something > will have to change for sure. > > > >One possible option could be to use the > > >slots, but only send ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR or ABS_MT_PRESSURE, nothing > > >else. The device would (rightfully) not be recognized as MT since the > > >position is missing, all data would be available for processing in > > >userspace, and bandwidth would be minimized since there could only be > > >so many changes coming in per millisecond. > > > > So how does userspace then finds out where these pressure points are > > located? > > Or do you mean to just dump all data to user space (15 * 13 * > > sizeof(ABS_MT_PRESSURE value) + overhead)? > > Having each pressure point represented by one slot id was the idea. > Userspace would have to know how the points are mapped, of > course. Still not overly happy about the general fit, though. Dmitry? I am having doubts that this device, as it is, is suitable for input interface; I really do not think that bastardizing slot IDs is good idea. Unless we move all computation necessary to identify individual contacts into the kernel (and then use standard MT protocol), I'd recommend looking into hidraw + uinput solution. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
