Hi Shubhrajyoti,
Thanks for the feedback. Please see my comments below.
On 01/01/2012 10:38 PM, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
Hi Christopher,
On Thursday 22 December 2011 07:39 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote:
Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny<cheiny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Naveen Kumar Gaddipati<naveen.gaddipati@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joeri de Gram<j.de.gram@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c | 436 ++++++++++++
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c | 1488 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h | 97 +++
3 files changed, 2021 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
[snip]
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int rmi_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS
+ const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
+
+ if (pm&& pm->suspend)
+ return pm->suspend(dev);
If driver-pm- suspend is not there should you not fall back to . suspend ?
I'm looking into using dev->driver->suspend() here. It wants a
pm_message_t for the pm state. We don't have that on entry to
bus_suspend, though. Any suggestion as to what we should pass?
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
