On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:17:02PM -0500, Xi Wang wrote: > On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > No, the variable that used to be a u8 - was it 8 bits wide for a reason? > > The return value of CMA3000_READ? I don't see any particular reason. > The data returned by CMA3000_READ() is a byte, so that's the reason (and I am guessing here) that the author used u8 to store the result, forgetting that the range was extended to report error conditions. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
