On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011, 18:16:51 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > > > Yeah. Plausibly the model we have in hid is wrong at the moment - rather > > > than set flags that block suspend, it might make more sense to take > > > references. It'd complicate things a little, in that we'd have to take > > > more care in terms of keeping track of the state. > > > > I am afraid references are very hard to take there because it needs to be done > > in interrupt. > > True. That makes things rather more awkward. What about the second idea I mentioned? If autosuspend fails with -EBUSY or -EAGAIN, usbcore could schedule another autosuspend attempt. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
