Re: [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011, 18:16:51 schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:28:06AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > Well, if the usage counter is 0 then you wouldn't want to call
> > usb_put_interface_async().  On the other hand, if the usage counter is
> > 0 then by definition the device isn't in use, so you shouldn't need to
> > fail an autosuspend request -- not unless it races with an I/O event.
> 
> Yeah. Plausibly the model we have in hid is wrong at the moment - rather 
> than set flags that block suspend, it might make more sense to take 
> references. It'd complicate things a little, in that we'd have to take 
> more care in terms of keeping track of the state.

I am afraid references are very hard to take there because it needs to be done
in interrupt.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux