On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:10:12AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2011, 02:11:03 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > > > Ah, right, sorry - I wasn't trying to use the device after it had been > > closed. In an ideal world we'd really want to be able to indicate that > > we don't want a remote wakeup in that situation. Otherwise, the patch > > looks good. Thank you! > > It looks like we had exactly that capability until > 48826626263d4a61d06fd8c5805da31f925aefa0 > removed it. > Hmm, reading Alan's comment I can see why wakeup might be beneficial when system is in the sleep state, but while it is running and there is no driver or driver wants to disable wakeups I think we should accommodate it. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
