On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:10:12AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2011, 02:11:03 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > > > Ah, right, sorry - I wasn't trying to use the device after it had been > > closed. In an ideal world we'd really want to be able to indicate that > > we don't want a remote wakeup in that situation. Otherwise, the patch > > looks good. Thank you! > > It looks like we had exactly that capability until > 48826626263d4a61d06fd8c5805da31f925aefa0 > removed it. Hm. Throwing in another related question below. Problem: the hid keyboard driver refuses to suspend while a key is pressed, which is fine per se, but there is no indication presented to the power layer, resulting in a failed suspend and (due to complex reasons it seems) disabled autosuspend. Question: If the hid interrupt handler were to actually prevent suspend during keypress, what would be the natural way to do it? Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
