On Friday, September 16, 2011 04:47:00 PM Henrik Rydberg wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:48:56 AM Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > > > Globally, the patch is clean. I don't really like it because a > > > > cleaner way would be to just remove the field .maxcontacts in > > > > MT_CLS_EGALAX. This would require tests from all the different > > > > eGalax owners, and personally, I don't have the time to lead them. > > > > > > It is not too late to start now, though; testing this new device > > > without maxcontacts would help when/if the ten-finger version comes > > > along. Marek, would you care to try that? > > > > Well I own only this one particular device, not the other ones. > > I meant removing .maxcontacts from _your_ patch, and testing on your > particular device. Ah all right, yes, I can try it. But only _after_ my exam on wednesday (or before in case I start being tired of learning). You're welcome! Cheers > > Thanks, > Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
