Re: INPUT_COMPAT_TEST

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:40:46AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 11:37 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>
> >>I thought there were pointers, (or longs) there too.
> >>
> >>In fact, we might have had the worst of both worlds here...
> >
> >The pointers are in ioctl paths (upload of force-feedback effects with
> >custom waveforms - noone actually uses them in real life).
> >
> 
> Ah... we might have lucked out then!
> 
> The proc/sysfs issue is still HUGE, however, because that affects
> all the read/write paths *indirectly*.
> 

Yeah, we are stuck with these unfortunately... Unless we want to say
that x32 applications will be presented with bitmaps encoded with 64-bit
segments instead of 32-bit ones. This would mostly matter to startup
scripts... X and the others use ioctls, not proc/sysfs.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux