RE: [PATCH] input: keyboard: adp5589-keys: Add support for the ADP5585 derivatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Torokhov wrote on 2011-08-04:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:49:17AM +0200, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>> On 08/04/2011 05:19 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:30:08AM +0200, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>>>> On 07/29/2011 03:00 PM, michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> From: Michael Hennerich<michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> The ADP5585 family keypad decoder and IO expander is similar to the
>>>>> ADP5589, however it features less IO pins, and lacks hardware
>>>>> assisted key- lock functionality. Unfortunately the register
>>>>> addresses are different, as well as the event codes and bit
>>>>> organization within the port related registers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Move ADP5589 Register defines from the header file into the main
>>>>> source file. Add new defines while making sure we don't break
>>>>> existing platform_data. Add register address translation, and turn
>>>>> device specific defines into variables. Introduce some helper
>>>>> functions and disable functions that doesn't exist on the added
>>>>> devices.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich<michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig        |    4 +-
>>>>>  drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c |  607
>>>>>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/input/adp5589.h
>>>>>      |  157 ++++----- 3 files changed, 549 insertions(+), 219
>>>>>  deletions(-)
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> If you prefer support for the ADP5585 as separate driver, please let
>>>> me know.
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> No, I actually like this approach very much, but do you think we could
>>> have adp5589-keys.c, adp5585-keys.c and adp558x-keys-core.c? The
>>> register definitions put all in one file are a bit overwhelming...
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> The register look-up table used for the ADP5585 also requires the
>> ADP5589 defines.
>> Also the core file would need the ADP5589 defines. So I don't think
>> splitting stuff into
>> 3 source files will greatly improve things.
>
> Hmm... let me mull this over...

Hi Dmitry,

Any chance to get the adp5585 patch into input next?

Greetings,
Michael

--
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux