Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:52:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:31:27PM +0800, JJ Ding wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:38:18 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:57:06AM +0800, JJ Ding wrote:
> > > > For v2 hardware, there is no real parity check, but we can still check
> > > > some constant bits for data integrity.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: JJ Ding <jj_ding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > > > index cf41f23..032181c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > > > @@ -376,6 +376,25 @@ static int elantech_check_parity_v1(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > > > etd->parity[packet[3]] == p3;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int packet_simple_check_v2(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct elantech_data *etd = psmouse->private;
> > > > + unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (etd->reports_pressure)
> > > > + return (packet[0] & 0x0c) == 0x04 &&
> > > > + (packet[3] & 0x0f) == 0x02;
> > this is for newer v2 hardware
> >
> > > > +
> > > > + if ((packet[0] & 0xc0) == 0x80)
> > > > + return (packet[0] & 0x0c) == 0x0c &&
> > > > + (packet[3] & 0x0e) == 0x08;
> > this is for older v2, two finger touch
> >
> > > > +
> > > > + return (packet[0] & 0x3c) == 0x3c &&
> > > > + (packet[1] & 0xf0) == 0x00 &&
> > > > + (packet[3] & 0x3e) == 0x38 &&
> > > > + (packet[4] & 0xf0) == 0x00;
> > this is for older v2, 1/3 finger touch
> >
> > >
> > > Can we please spell out the assumptions under which we decide that
> > > packet is invalid?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dmitry
> > V2 hardware has two flavors. Older ones that do not report pressure,
> > and newer ones that reports pressure and width.
> >
> > With newer ones, all packets (1, 2, 3 finger touch) have the same
> > constant bits.
> >
> > With older ones, 1/3 finger touch packets and 2 finger touch packets have
> > different constant bits.
> >
> > With all three cases, if the constant bits are not exactly what I
> > expected, I consider them invalid.
> >
> > Dmitry, how do you want me to improve this? not enough comments?
>
> Right, if you could put the above into comments right in the
> packet_simple_check_v2() that woudl be great.
>
> Thanks.
No problem. I will do that.
> --
> Dmitry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
