On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 22:57 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:41:22PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > You tend to find that in a lot of systems only need a subset of the > > platform data - some of it can get pretty esoteric - or perhaps none at > > all so they'll be able to run happily even if not everything can be > > configured via the device tree. > That is why I said "devices that can't be adequately expressed". If we > can have bindings that satisfy majority of users then of course DT > handling code is more than welcome. You seemed to be suggesting that devices that have platform data that can't be expressed aren't worth adding DT support to - my point was that the value is more dependant on the system needs than on the full feature set that a driver can express. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
