On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:00:31AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 06:13:21PM +0530, Mohan Pallaka wrote: > > For chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes > > would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't > > have support for pwm though the chip is programmed to work > > in non-pwm mode. Add __weak attributed pwm functions to avoid > > compilation issues in these scenarios. > > > > Russell, > > You seem to have authored pwm.h, do you have any objections to this > change? This seems to be a recipe for an oops. Have a look at how linux/regulator/consumer.h deals with this kind of problem, and notice that we have CONFIG_HAVE_PWM to indicate whether this interface is supported or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
