> > Benjamin: Since field->index == 0 is in use, it seems the driver could > > execute event emission wrongly under some circumstances (when > > last_field_index == 0). Is that related to the reason for the quirk in > > this patch? > > In fact, I have a second patch just on top of this one. It has been > tested by Ryan with PenMount devices. Great, and good timing. :-) > I was waiting for Penmount to be included first as it does not impact > any other drivers. I would prefer the opposite order, since it is cleaner and means one less device to test for the major change. > > I inline the code here, but my gmail client will destroy tabs (so I > attached it too).... > > Can you test it against 3M? I will test it against 3M and egalax. Thanks! Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
