On 04/04/2011 02:13 PM, Jeffrey Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'd happuly take Chase's patch, but want to make sure that we don't cause >> any changes that would make backwards compatilibity an issue later. > > There should be no compatibility issues. However, we might be better > off in the long term taking (some variation of) these patches instead. I like the proposed changes, but I want to ensure stable kernel releases aren't left out of the fix for hid-magicmouse. I don't know the best way forward, but here's one possibility: 1. Apply my patch to manually set the buffer size hint 2. It gets sent to stable trees due to the 'Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx' line 3. Apply Jeffrey's patches, including a reversion of my buffer size hint Obviously the extra application and reversion is odd, but this seems the easiest way forward given that the patches already exist and can be applied without issue. Thanks, -- Chase -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
