On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Rafi Rubin wrote: > On a related note, I looked into switching to usbhid_submit_report for firmware > version polling but it looks like the report offset (or something like that) is > wrong. > > I get: > af082500 > > usbmon shows the devices sends: > 0c002508 afe10000 > > If I change the report offset in the field to 8, I get the desired bits: > e1af0825 > > > I don't really know much about parsing the hid descriptors, so I don't know why > its off by a byte. Perhaps its worth testing a different firmware to see if > this is specific to my current firmware. I am not really sure I fully understand what you are saying here. Just for clarification: - isn't the byte the 'report id' number here? - does your message mean that the patch doesn't work? Or is this quite the contrary -- explanation why it is written the way it is (i.e. using usb_control_msg() instead of usbhid_submit_report())? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
