>> Ping has touched upon this subject as well, from the pen & touch perspective. >> Generally, some ABS axes are actually enumerations, for which we have no >> direct abstraction. If we had a way to declare the used values for such >> enumerations, it would resolve these and possibly other issues. > I think that presence of pen/touch can be detected by having > BTN_TOOL_PEN and BTN_TOOL_FINGER. However in this case the tool is > finger, so I do not think we should introduce BTN_TOOL_ENVELOPE. Maybe > this is another case where we should employ the proposed device flags? Yes. Having something like INPUT_QUIRK_SEMI_MT might be enough, and we could drop the whole MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE circus. Chase, Peter, Chris, would you be comfortable with such a solution? > Anyway, it looks like we have a few concerns with current > MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE so I want to rewind my 'next' branch. Yep. Should I also take the opportunity to sync from -rc1 instead, and fold the cleanup patches into the appropriate places? Thanks, Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
