Hi Chase, > > I gave this some more thought, and I was close to accepting it with > documentation of the above restrictions. Then I thought of how the > following two devices would be presented to userspace: > > 1. A real MT device supporting up to 2 touches (e.g. a bamboo touch) > - ABS_{X,Y}, BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_FINGER, and BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP for ST > - ABS_MT_SLOT, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, ABS_MT_POSITION_{X,Y}, ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE > > 2. A partial MT device using MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE (e.g. synaptics MT) > - ABS_{X,Y}, BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_FINGER, and BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP for ST > - ABS_MT_SLOT, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, ABS_MT_POSITION_{X,Y}, ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE > > Note that they are identical! The range of values for each axis would be > identical too. The only way to tell the two apart would be to watch for > the ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE axis. Ping has touched upon this subject as well, from the pen & touch perspective. Generally, some ABS axes are actually enumerations, for which we have no direct abstraction. If we had a way to declare the used values for such enumerations, it would resolve these and possibly other issues. Thanks, Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html