On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:04:50PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > One concern is that while 32 distinct device types should be enough > > > should we plan for larger capability array? Should we use variable > > length ioctl - like EVIOCGKEY(len) - even though Arnd does not like > > them? > > > Sounds good, but then again the struct approach feels quite extensible too... > Actually the more I think about it the less I like idea of extending the struct because while keeping ABI is pretty easy there are other issues. I'll CC you on EVIOCGKEYCODE patch so you can see my concerns. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
