On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:21:05 -0500 simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Doesn't look like this was picked up by anybody... at least there was no > 'ack'. > missing [PATCH] prefix (maybe [PATCH v2] ot v3 for the next round?), and it was sent as attachment, while this list prefers patches in the email body, with out-of-patch comments after the '---' separator. > On behalf of Antonio, please find attached a git-ized version of the patch. > The commit short description is too long, limit it to 72 chars, and if needed add a longer description in the commit message body. Also the Signed-off-by line is missing, if you are the author, then it would need your sign off Simon, if Antonio Orefice is the author, then use his, with no need of the Reported-by. The procedure may look tedious but the collaboration is based all on that, and on the other hand if you have interest to have the patch submitted, you have the motivation to conform to it; check out Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the kernel dir. > This just add the USB ID's. Builds OK against Linus' git tree, but I don't > have the wheel to test. > > Cheers, > Simon Wood. > http://www.speed-dreams.org Regards, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Attachment:
pgpU4uChG4Vxw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
