Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another question is why do you want to poll the same device at > different intervals? The processor is already woken up so it makes sense > to do as much as possible instead of going to sleep. In your case > 200/700 for every 1400ms interval you wake an extra time to poll > switches so unless polling switches takes very long time it is better to > combine them together (and into one input device, probably). I see. That is a good question :) I didn't realize that splitting into two separate input devices with different polling intervals would have the opposite effect than what I intended. Thank you for pointing this out. I will definitely integrate them into one input device polled at 200ms. Best Regards, Ben Gardiner --- Nanometrics Inc. http://www.nanometrics.ca -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
