On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Are we going to do the tocuh and pen aribtration in input-mt.c? I need >> to understand this to make my patches. > > If the pen is implemented as just another contact, it will also be treated as > such, and arbitration becomes the same thing as single-pointer emulation. As we discussed earlier, pen is on a separate logical port for USB devices. But that should not be an issue in the kernel driver, i.e., input-mt.c. I'd love to wait for the implementation of input-mt.c. Do you have a rough timeline for it? If we want to merge pen, and other tool types in the future, into the same MT slot, a way to tell the userland of the different size and resolution of the tool is a must. Or maybe you have other suggestions on "pen is implemented as just another contact"? Ping -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
