On Oct 26, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 18:00 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 17:40 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>>> Mind if I move the time to the front like this?
>>>>> +#define dbg(format, arg...) \
>>>>> +do { \
>>>>> + if (i8042_debug) \
>>>>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG KBUILD_MODNAME ": [%d]" format), \
>>>>> + (int)(jiffies - i8042_start_time), ##arg); \
>>>>> +} while (0)
>>>> Another option would be to leave '\n' in dbg() and leave most of the
>>>> callers as is.
>>> That's really error prone though.
>> In what way?
>
> $ grep -w dbg drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | cat -n
> 1 dbg("%02x <- i8042 (flush, %s)", data,
> 2 dbg("%02x -> i8042 (command)", command & 0xff);
> 3 dbg("%02x -> i8042 (parameter)", param[i]);
> 4 dbg(" -- i8042 (timeout)");
> 5 dbg(" -- i8042 (auxerr)");
> 6 dbg("%02x <- i8042 (return)", param[i]);
> 7 dbg("%02x -> i8042 (kbd-data)", c);
> 8 dbg("Extra keyboard ACK - filtered out\n");
> 9 dbg("Filtered out by platform filter\n");
> 10 if (irq) dbg("Interrupt %d, without any data", irq);
> 11 dbg("MUX error, status is %02x, data is %02x", str, data);
> 12 dbg("%02x <- i8042 (interrupt, %d, %d%s%s)",
> 13 dbg("%02x <- i8042 (aux_test_irq, %s)",
> 14 dbg(" -- i8042 (aux irq test timeout)");
> 15 dbg("%02x -> i8042 (panic blink)", 0xed);
> 16 dbg("%02x -> i8042 (panic blink)", led);
>
> I think 2 defects in 16 uses is a pretty high error rate.
But how not adding /n is it much better than having it if some later change will forget to add it to the message?
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
