On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Sundar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Absolutely. Another point worth mentioning is that a device in > > runtime-suspend can be resumed at any time, for a variety of reasons > > unconnected with anything the user does. While it is back at full > > power, there is nothing to stop it from generating events. > > > > Well, so are you still aligned that we can support low power or enable/disable > switches for devices via the standard PM helpers; even if it is the "accelerated > suspend" way ( if Rafael thinks otherwise) Sorry, I don't quite understand your question. I think it would be okay to add an interface for userspace to cut short a runtime-suspend delay, but I don't think anything more is needed. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
