On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:07:03AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 09:40:38AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > > I really don't think it's a good idea to add this code to every single > > regulator using driver - this seems like an enormous waste of time and > > code complexity cost. I have suggested several times that we should > > extend the dummy regulator mode so that boards can enable it from code > > as well as users enable it from Kconfig, I'm not sure why everyone is so > > keen on bodging this in drivers. > It all depends on what instances you expect to encounted more often - > drivers or boards without regulators... If the board doesn't use regulators you can just disable the regulator API at which point it compiles out into stubs which report success - this has been the case from day one. There's only an issue if the board has a regulator configuration which is partially visible to software. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
