On 09/20/2010 10:01 PM, Stéphane Chatty wrote:
>
> Le 20 sept. 10 à 21:51, Henrik Rydberg a écrit :
>
>> On 09/20/2010 09:46 PM, Stéphane Chatty wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Le 28 août 10 à 16:29, Henrik Rydberg a écrit :
>>>
>>>> #define MAX_SLOTS 60
>>>> -#define MAX_TRKID 59
>>>> +#define MAX_TRKID USHRT_MAX
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oops, I forgot this one: in the rest of the code, it seems to me that you use
>>> your knowledge that TRACKINGID cannot be more than 59 (you use it to map the
>>> tracking ID onto the slot ID). Therefore, why change TRKID to a larger value?
>>
>>
>> There are only 60 slots available, but an infinite number of tracking ids.
>> Nowhere is the tracking id assumed to be bounded by anything but MAX_TRKID.
>>
>
> What about this:
> + value = clamp_val(value, 0, MAX_SLOTS - 1);
> if (md->valid) {
> md->curid = value;
> md->f[value].touch = md->touch;
>
> If you had tracking IDs 59, 60 and 61 in the same frame, this would not work
> properly would it?
That is the slot id being set. The microtouch controller is also using slots
internally.
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
