Is this the *second* device for which I made the mistake?? Gosh.
St.
Le 8 sept. 10 à 14:33, Jiri Kosina a écrit :
The device is handled by hid-mosart driver, and therefore should
be present in hid_blacklist[], not hid_ignore_list[].
Cc: Stephane Chatty <chatty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index 2baf959..3f72924 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1285,6 +1285,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id
hid_blacklist[] = {
{ HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE,
USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_ALU_WIRELESS_2009_JIS) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE,
USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_FOUNTAIN_TP_ONLY) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE,
USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_GEYSER1_TP_ONLY) },
+ { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS, USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUS_T91MT) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS,
USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUSTEK_MULTITOUCH_YFO) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_BELKIN, USB_DEVICE_ID_FLIP_KVM) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_BTC,
USB_DEVICE_ID_BTC_EMPREX_REMOTE) },
@@ -1580,7 +1581,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id
hid_ignore_list[] = {
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AIPTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_AIPTEK_24) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AIRCABLE, USB_DEVICE_ID_AIRCABLE1) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ALCOR,
USB_DEVICE_ID_ALCOR_USBRS232) },
- { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS, USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUS_T91MT)},
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUSTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUSTEK_LCM)},
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUSTEK,
USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUSTEK_LCM2)},
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AVERMEDIA,
USB_DEVICE_ID_AVER_FM_MR800) },
--
1.7.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
