Re: HIDDEV: potential NULL dereference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jiri,

   > If hid was ever NULL at this phase, the check couldn't improve
   > anything due to hid->driver_data dereference being still before
   > the check. So again my question, how this could change anything?
   > 
   > Above that, it just makes the window shorter, but the bug is
   > still there, isn't it? Is the following scenario reasonable?

You're right -- I'd missed the other dereference, sorry.  It's
surprising that we have two reports from users saying that the
patch got rid of a reproducible oops for them.

Dan Carpenter has commented on this too:
   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg10541.html

As he says, it looks like the code's overdue for some real locking.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux