> +static int ak8974_regulators_on(struct ak8974_chip *chip)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + msleep(AK8974_POWERON_DELAY);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ak8974_regulators_off(struct ak8974_chip *chip)
> +{
> + regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
> +}
That bit seems platform specific but in generic code ?
> +static ssize_t ak8974_misc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offset)
> +{
> + struct ak8974_chip *chip = container_of(file->private_data,
> + struct ak8974_chip,
> + miscdev);
> + struct ak8974_data data;
So we have a different API to the ak8975 just posted and to the other
existing devices. This needs sorting out across the devices before there
is a complete disaster. Right now we have a mix of submissions pending
which variously use
misc + sysfs
sysfs
input (reporting X Y Z etc axes)
Someone needs to decide on a single API before it's too late.
> +
> + if (count < sizeof(data))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (*offset >= chip->offset) {
> + schedule_work(&chip->work);
> + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + if (wait_event_interruptible(chip->misc_wait,
> + (*offset < chip->offset)))
> + return -ERESTARTSYS;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> + data.x = chip->x;
> + data.y = chip->y;
> + data.z = chip->z;
> + data.valid = chip->valid;
> + *offset = chip->offset;
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
What happens if you have two readers - is it fine they get copies of the
same event when it races ?
> +
> + return copy_to_user(buf, &data, sizeof(data)) ? -EFAULT : sizeof(data);
Pedantically if data is consumed and a partial copy occurs you should
return the bytes successfully copied.
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_id, S_IRUGO, ak8974_show_chip_id, NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t ak8974_show_range(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct ak8974_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", chip->max_range);
> +}
Other devices make all of this sysfs or use input. We need to work out
what the right interface actually is.
> + snprintf(chip->name, sizeof(chip->name), "ak8974%d",
> + atomic_add_return(1, &device_number) - 1);
Surely this is serialized anyway ?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int ak8974_suspend(struct i2c_client *client, pm_message_t mesg)
> +{
> + struct ak8974_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + mutex_lock(&chip->users_lock);
> + if (chip->users > 0)
> + ak8974_enable(chip, AK8974_PWR_OFF);
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->users_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ak8974_resume(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct ak8974_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + mutex_lock(&chip->users_lock);
> + if (chip->users > 0)
> + ak8974_enable(chip, AK8974_PWR_ON);
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->users_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
The whole chip->users thing you are implementing is basically a
reimplementation of the kernel runtime pm stuff - so can that be used
instead ?
> +#ifndef __LINUX_I2C_AK8974_H
> +#define __LINUX_I2C_AK8974_H
> +
> +#define AK8974_NO_MAP 0
> +#define AK8974_DEV_X 1
> +#define AK8974_DEV_Y 2
> +#define AK8974_DEV_Z 3
> +#define AK8974_INV_DEV_X -1
> +#define AK8974_INV_DEV_Y -2
> +#define AK8974_INV_DEV_Z -3
> +
> +struct ak8974_platform_data {
> + s8 axis_x;
> + s8 axis_y;
> + s8 axis_z;
> +};
> +
> +/* Device name: /dev/ak8974n, where n is a running number */
> +struct ak8974_data {
> + __s16 x;
> + __s16 y;
> + __s16 z;
> + __u16 valid;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
This could go in the C file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
