Re: Handling of large keycodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:23:45AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 31-07-2010 06:19, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
> > The usefulnes of reserved data elements in the structure is 
> > doubtful,
> > since we do not seem to require them being set to a particular value and
> > so we'll be unable to distinguish betwee legacy and newer users.
> 
> David proposed some parameters that we rejected on our discussions. As we
> might need to add something similar, I decided to keep it on my approach,
> since a set of reserved fields wouldn't hurt (and removing it on our discussions
> would be easy), but I'm ok on removing them.

The parameters that we'll need for the ir subsystem can be implemented 
in a different way in the future (with no changes necessary to the input 
subsystem) so I'm also ok with removing them.


-- 
David Härdeman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux