On 8/2/2010 2:12 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> On 8/2/2010 12:38 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Joonyoung Shim wrote: >>>> Hi, I came back from vacation. >>>> >>>>>>>> Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung >>>>>>>> tree these added sched.h including. >>>>>>> I applied the patch adding samsung-keypad.c and the platform data >>>>>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/keypad.h and I expect that >>>>>>> patches to actually enable keypad will go through appropriate >>>>>>> platform tree(s). >>>>>>> >>>>>> OK, the rest will go through samsung platform tree >>>>>> >>>>> Ok..will apply. >>>>> >>>> Kukjin, could you remove keypad.h on the commit "ARM: SAMSUNG: Add >>>> keypad device support" of the samsung platform tree. The keypad.h file >>>> was included on input tree. >>>> >> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git;a=commit;h=0fffed27f92d9d7 >>>> a34de9fe017b7082b5958bb93) >>> You mean in plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c? >>> If remove inclusion plat/keypad.h in there, following build error happens. >>> >> No. I mean to remove arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/keypad.h file on >> samsung platform tree, it was applied on input tree already. If needs, i >> can repost. >> > If it is not small change like to remove a file in a patch, I think should be re-submitted. > Will drop your previous patch in my tree. > >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:41: warning: 'struct >> samsung_keypad_platdata' declared inside parameter list >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:41: warning: its scope is only this definition >> or declaration, which is probably not what you want >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c: In function >> 'samsung_keypad_set_platdata': >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:50: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to >> incomplete type 'struct samsung_keypad_platdata' >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:54: error: dereferencing pointer to >> incomplete type >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:55: error: dereferencing pointer to >> incomplete type >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:55: error: 'samsung_keypad_cfg_gpio' >> undeclared (first use in this function) >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:55: error: (Each undeclared identifier is >> reported only once >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.c:55: error: for each function it appears in.) >>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-keypad.o] Error 1 >>> >>> As you know, released 35 today. So we have no much time for this merge >> window. >> I'm not sure about merge rule, but I think the compile problem can be >> solved by merge to 36 of input tree and samsung platform tree. > > Hmm...actually, already informed about that on linux-next. > If it's just build problem, I or Dmitry can fix it. However, this is not just that. > I cannot understand how your 'plat/keypad.h' was included to both of patch. Please see the prior mail history. The keypad.h file is included only at the 1/3 patch in the original patch set, but Dmitry applied the 3/3 patch modified with keypad.h. The basic problem is that each patches be applied on two tree. It makes compile errors at the one tree lacking keypad.h file because both tree share keypad.h file. There are two solutions, First, all patches go to one tree. Second, we wait for merging to 36 of both tree then apply platform patches. > And I'm not sure, should be 'plat/keypad.h' in which tree... > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
