Re: [PATCH 10/13] IR: extend interfaces to support more device settings LIRC: add new IOCTL that enables learning mode (wide band receiver)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:10 +0200, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> on 31 Jul 10 at 01:01, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 23:22 +0200, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> [...]
> >>> +#define LIRC_SET_WIDEBAND_RECEIVER     _IOW('i', 0x00000023, __u32)
> >>
> >> If you really want this new ioctl, then it should be clarified how it
> >> behaves in relation to LIRC_SET_MEASURE_CARRIER_MODE.
> 
> > In my opinion, I won't need the LIRC_SET_MEASURE_CARRIER_MODE,
> > I would just optionally turn that on in learning mode.
> > You disagree, and since that is not important (besides TX and learning
> > features are present only at fraction of ENE devices. The only user I
> > did the debugging with, doesn't seem to want to help debug that code
> > anymore...)
> >
> > But anyway, in current state I want these features to be independent.
> > Driver will enable learning mode if it have to.
> 
> Please avoid the term "learning mode" as to you it probably means  
> something different than to me.
> 
> >
> > I'll add the documentation.
> 
> >>
> >> Do you have to enable the wide-band receiver explicitly before you can
> >> enable carrier reports or does enabling carrier reports implicitly switch
> >> to the wide-band receiver?
> > I would implicitly switch the learning mode on, untill user turns off
> > the carrier reports.
> 
> You mean that you'll implicitly switch on the wide-band receiver. Ok.
> 
> >>
> >> What happens if carrier mode is enabled and you explicitly turn off the
> >> wide-band receiver?
> > Wouldn't it be better to have one ioctl for both after all?
> 
> There may be hardware that allows carrier measurement but does not have a  
> wide-band receiver. And there may be hardware that does have a wide-band  
> receiver but does not allow carrier measurement. irrecord needs to be able  
> to distinguish these cases, so we need separate ioctls.
> 
> I'd say: carrier reports may switch on the wide-band reciever implicitly.  
> In that case the wide-band receiver cannot be switched off explicitly  
> until carrier reports are disabled again. It just needs to be documented.

No problem.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux