> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-input-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-input-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Lin > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:01 PM > To: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: wayne > Subject: [RFC 36/36] [Driver][Qualcomm 1070][VERSION] 0.2.0 > > From: wayne <wayne.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > I haven't looked at all the patches, but I see may patches that are changing only 1 or 2 lines. Do these really need to separated as such? If you collate patches functionally, having description would also help. Also, I noticed many changes to the defconfigs. You may want to take a look at this discussion: http://amailbox.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/6/4579948 ~sanjeev > --- > arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c > index f665d9f..be21aae 100755 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > #include "smd_private.h" > > #define KERNEL_VERSION UTS_RELEASE > -#define IMAGE_VERSION "0.1.2" > +#define IMAGE_VERSION "0.2.0" > > static int version_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > { > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
