RE: [RFC 36/36] [Driver][Qualcomm 1070][VERSION] 0.2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-input-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-input-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Lin
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: wayne
> Subject: [RFC 36/36] [Driver][Qualcomm 1070][VERSION] 0.2.0
> 
> From: wayne <wayne.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

I haven't looked at all the patches, but I see may patches that are
changing only 1 or 2 lines. Do these really need to separated as such?

If you collate patches functionally, having description would also help.

Also, I noticed many changes to the defconfigs. You may want to take
a look at this discussion:
http://amailbox.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/6/6/4579948

~sanjeev

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c
> index f665d9f..be21aae 100755
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/version.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>  #include "smd_private.h"
>  
>  #define KERNEL_VERSION UTS_RELEASE
> -#define IMAGE_VERSION "0.1.2"
> +#define IMAGE_VERSION "0.2.0"
>  
>  static int version_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  {
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-input" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux