Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >>> This version implements buffer locking using event_lock as you >>> suggested, such that we can proceed with fixing the evdev buffer >>> problem independently from providing a suitable one-to-many buffer. >>> >>> The first patch converts the per-client buffers to a common buffer, >>> and adds a fixme since the code is expected to be further >>> improved. The second and third patch includes your review comments. >> Henrik, >> >> Applied to .36 queue with minor adjustments, please take a peek in my >> 'for-linus' branch and see if you spot anything wrong. > > Hi Dmitry, > > I guess you forgot to push it to kernel.org? Last change I see in your > tree is 6 days old. > > Thanks, > ... which seems like a lucky strike; the patch has a blatant security hole, leaking grabbed events to listening clients after ungrab. I sent an updated patch to Dmitry earlier today, in a brown paper bag. Not knowing if the original patch was actually applied or not, I thought I had better hold on to the change just a little bit. Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
