On Monday 24 May 2010 10:06:15 am Ping Cheng wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:07:27PM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote: > >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Peter Hutterer > >> > >> <peter.hutterer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > And yes, you could add it once we find it's an issue, but by then > >> >> > someone has already spent time to work around this. And when you > >> >> > then start sending slot events all the time, you admit that > >> >> > writing the workaround was just a time waster :) > >> >> > >> >> Work around what, exactly? > >> > > >> > I was referring to having a protocol where processes has to ignore > >> > contacts already down until they've been there when a contact was > >> > pressed (and your comment that if this becomes an issue it could be > >> > added lateron). Now, the ignoring part needs to be written (this is > >> > the "workaround" referred to above). if you're planning to add it > >> > later, we need to cater for that part as well then, having two > >> > implementations depending on the kernel versions. > >> > > >> > but this is just for clarification, it's a moot point anyway given > >> > that button events have the same behaviour. > >> > >> This topic is outside of the _MT_ protocol discussion. > >> > >> However, it is indeed an issue with all filtered input events, both > >> for MT and regular ones. > >> > >> I think we need to add an ioctl to enable user land driver/client to > >> signal the kernel driver to send all events without filtering, just > >> once. Hot-plugged devices and X driver starts after user has contacted > >> with the device are two examples that the client would miss filtered > >> events. > >> > >> Dmitry, do you think it is a valid suggestion? > > > > What about using EVIOCGKEY/EVIOCGSW/EVIOCGABS? > > Those EVIOCs only give us the static values (max/min/supported keys, > etc.). We need their dynamic input data here, the actual x, y, > button, pressure, etc. Am I missing something about those EVIOs? > Yes you are ;) Supported events are reported via EVIOCGBIT, EVIOCGKEY and EVIOCGSW will return current state of keys/switches. As far as EVIOCGABS goes, it also returns, besides min/max/etc, last reported _values_ of the ABS_* events. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html