Ping Cheng wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Rafi Rubin <rafi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> Ping: please confirm, are you actually talking about each finger simultaneously sending multiple positions? > > You are definitely on the right track. The fingers/touch objects can > be represented two-dimensionally (x,y) instead of one-dimensionally > (ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID). I think we can survive with the current MT_BLOB > definition although some optimization would be helpful, especially for > filtering. For the sake of Henrik great effort, I'd like to see his > current patchset gets in the tree before we start another round of > "suggestions". > > Thank you for asking. Regarding blobs, I confused myself yesterday. The original intention of the blob id was in fact to be able to "paint" more generic contact forms. However, no driver has come close to doing this yet, so it has gotten close to no attention. Now, to address the question of how to communicate more elaborate contact forms, it seems one can combine the two goals "one position per slot" and "multiple positions per contact" by simply repeating the same tracking id for a set of slots, like this: ABS_SLOT 0 ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 14 ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[0] ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[0] ABS_SLOT 1 ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 14 ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[1] ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[1] ABS_SLOT 2 ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 14 ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[2] ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[2] Not all too different from what you suggested, and there is no blob id involved at all. And yes, it would require additional parsing power at the user end. Something for later. Cheers, Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
